TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 81F5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemLenovo 81F5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191009
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 08:14
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NIC-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Memory 17.2
1-Core 10.2
2-Core 19.4
10% 15.6 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 52.1
6% 43.9 Pts
64-Core 53.8
3% 53.8 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 11.9%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.16
2% 2.41 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 4.17
3% 3.04 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 1.99%
 Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HBAF28FT Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 514 626 591 637 583 725 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 963
Write 694
Mixed 240
SusWrite 612
140% 627 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 13.2
49% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 76.1
DQ Write 54.1
DQ Mixed 66.5
49% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑
This bench: 93.8%
 Great: 310%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 04CB 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 10.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 342
12% 342 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 22.2%
 Great: 69%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 81F5 Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F5

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples728x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples214x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples183x
GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples1,111x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples39x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples13x
SSD
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples69x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples42x
HFS128G32TNF-N3A0A 128GBBench 66%, 1,919 samples40x
RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples112x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples86x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBHynixBench 56%, 2,591 samples63x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback