Lenovo 81F5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 84% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemLenovo 81F5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191009
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '20 at 15:17
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User NIC-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 84%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 107
48% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 264
27% 217 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 8.41
6% 9.05 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 15.3
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HBAF28FT Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 1218 1255 1432 1462 1467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2217
Write 1,832
Mixed 150
SusWrite 1,226
301% 1,356 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 67.2
218% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 87.3
149% 297 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 250%
Great: 310%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
901GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 365 337 366 366 368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 438
Write 364
Mixed 326
SusWrite 343
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 34.8
103% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 276
223% 316 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 121%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 11 9.7 11 9.6 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 95.4
Write 13.8
SusWrite 9.7
34% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Mixed 0
54% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 04CB 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 14.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81F5 Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback