Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120312
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 00:19
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 127
59% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 316
32% 262 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
EVGA(3842 1461) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 16
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 21.1
18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 389 368 385 331 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 322
Write 373
Mixed 309
SusWrite 378
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 34.1
126% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 157
133% 192 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
202GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 83 86 83 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 87
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 84.9
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 51%
WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB
10GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 42 40 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 45.6
Write 45.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 41.3
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 33%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140
39GB free
Firmware: 08.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 44.1
Write 42.3
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 41.8
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $689
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback