Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 21:30
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 514
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.01.33
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 25
Parallax 36.6
22% 29.7 fps
MRender 22.7
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 29.7
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW8SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,296
Write 1,121
Mixed 704
231% 1,040 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 46.7
163% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 477
344% 445 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x394A53463531323732415A2D314739453220 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback