Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 52.5 2-Core 106 51% 80.1 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 209 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.8% Above average	Lighting 65.4 Reflection 67.9 Parallax 90.3 53% 74.5 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 56.3 52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 171 148 217 189 151 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.2% Below average	Read 234 Write 84.9 Mixed 77.6 SusWrite 178 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 17.2 4K Mixed 9 37% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 13 10% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 100%
Seagate ST32000644NS 2TB 7,161 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 205GB free Firmware: GGB8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 63 62 63 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 108 Write 104 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 62.7 65% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 106GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 123 121 121 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 155 Write 143 Mixed 84.4 SusWrite 121 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 112%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 56GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 95 95 96 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 94.9 Write 90.9 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 95.6 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 77%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 34GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 96 97 97 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 87.8 Write 85 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 95.9 60% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 58%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.6 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.2% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 4 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 3.4 8% 7.45 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.2% Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 2GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.6 3.3 3.6 3.7 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	7.87% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 1.5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 3.4 9% 8.68 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.87% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.1% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	16x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	6x
A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	9x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	3x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	2x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	2x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 1,445 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16