Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150129
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '20 at 21:13
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 47.1 2-Core 92.9 48% 73.8 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 187 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.2% Above average	Lighting 64.4 Reflection 66 Parallax 88.9 52% 73.1 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 56 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 144 147 151 151 149 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 264 Write 152 Mixed 153 SusWrite 156 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 15.1 58% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 38.2 DQ Write 40.3 DQ Mixed 29.2 25% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 100%
Seagate ST32000644NS 2TB 7,161 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 205GB free Firmware: GGB8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 64 65 62 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 111 Write 106 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 63.3 66% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$34 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 111GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 122 123 122 122 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 147 Write 113 Mixed 76.8 SusWrite 121 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 112%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 57GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 102 102 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 61.7 Write 24.4 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 102 46% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 77%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 34GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 55 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 89.6 Write 85.7 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 53.8 53% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 58%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.06% Terrible	Read 15.7 Write 3.8 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 3.4 8% 7.17 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 2GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.4 4.8 4 3.1 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	8.52% Terrible	Read 21.1 Write 2.5 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 3.7 9% 8.78 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.1 127% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.52% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 Corsair CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.5% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.8 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	16x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	6x
A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	9x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	3x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	2x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	2x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 1,445 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16