Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '17 at 00:23
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	73%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 86.3 1-Core 52 2-Core 92.2 51% 76.8 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 154 22% 161 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 3102) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.90 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 19.8 Parallax 23.5 18% 22 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 26.7 Splatting 20.1 20% 25 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 480GB 1,234 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 22 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 361 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 18 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 215	77.1% Very good	Read 499 Write 452 Mixed 476 106% 475 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 14.5 82% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 61.7 64% 105 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 130%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 90GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 180 (03) Spinup time 156 154 3158 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6107 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17313 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5637 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1038 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6107 (C2) HDA temperature 119 88 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 162 111 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.7% Average	Read 64.7 Write 90.7 Mixed 92.6 63% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.32 81% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 58%
Seagate ST3320310CS 320GB 4,266 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 78GB free Firmware: SC14 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 82 46160958 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10823 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 66 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 34701839916 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 31211 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 19 (0C) Power cycle count 96 37 4966 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 7285 (BC) Unknown 100 98 8590065793 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 265 (BE) vendor-specific 77 49 387383319 (C2) HDA temperature 23 51 55834574871 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 45 27 46160958 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	33.7% Below average	Read 48.7 Write 68.5 Mixed 52.9 43% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.33 74% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 47,852 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.5% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 14 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	193x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	191x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	27x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16