HP 750-175se

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 750-175se  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '20 at 01:19
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 244
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 655
70% 560 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.9% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 46.6
46% 52.4 fps
MRender 44
Gravity 50
Splatting 48.4
39% 47.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 96 115 109 96 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 381
Write 324
Mixed 314
SusWrite 138
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 13.5
81% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 19.1
72% 158 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GNT Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 1315 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.3% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-175se Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: HP 750-175se

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback