MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 24 '20 at 21:38
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 83.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1118
102% 854 Pts
64-Core 2,098
130% 2,098 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 18.5
16% 17.7 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19
Splatting 20.2
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 257 44 40 40 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 493
Write 444
Mixed 346
SusWrite 144
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 44.4
157% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 161
132% 188 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86%
Great: 126%
Intel SSDSA2MH160G1GC 160GB
39GB free
Firmware: 045C8781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 55 58 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 252
Write 58.7
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 59
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 15.5
64% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 51.4
48% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 41%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
194GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 443 449 454 449 440 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 437
Mixed 433
SusWrite 446
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 51.2
169% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 202
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 2TB
752GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 30
Write 27.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 28.8
38% 28 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 40.8
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 35.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 111%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback