HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '20 at 11:53
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 172
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 230
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 10.8
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 15.3
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 78 60 56 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43% Average
Read 130
Write 350
Mixed 333
SusWrite 82.5
51% 224 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 21.4
80% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 96.9
DQ Mixed 112
101% 159 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP655409-150-HYCG 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback