Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateApr 24 '20 at 11:21
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 188
77% 129 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 407
55% 411 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 43.5
29% 38 fps
MRender 47.1
Gravity 43
Splatting 34.9
33% 41.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 461
Mixed 438
103% 461 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 42.9
142% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
895GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 147 147 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 132
Mixed 74
SusWrite 146
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3320813AS 320GB
78GB free
Firmware: SD23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 65 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 14.5
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 63.7
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Panram PUD31600C118GVS 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback