Notebook W51XTU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 53% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemNotebook W51XTU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W51XTU
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 07:28
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 43%
CPU Throttled 53%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2840
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 57.9
1-Core 10.4
2-Core 19.9
24% 29.4 Pts
4-Core 13.8
8-Core 13
2% 13.4 Pts
64-Core 16.9
1% 16.9 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5471) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.94
0% 0.71 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 32 30 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 23.1
Mixed 18
SusWrite 27.9
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 61%
Multiple Card Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Read 17.1
Write 13.8
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 14.6
18% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKH200SO25608-1600 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 0.3
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W51XTU Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W51XTU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback