Dell Latitude E7440

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E7440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 03HFCG
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 02:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 156
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 228
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 4.81
2% 3.9 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 5.74
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4AD0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 194 241 239 252 253 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 353
Write 151
Mixed 130
SusWrite 220
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 27.5
72% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 80.9
110% 206 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
684GB free
Firmware: JA2OA700
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 97 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 94
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 98.4
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS Kingston KN2M64-ETB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 19.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7440 Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback