Asrock Z97 Extreme3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140502
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 17:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 106
2-Core 246
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 483
61% 465 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 168 178 175 95 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 419
Mixed 333
SusWrite 170
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 48.4
176% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 252
202% 287 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 101%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 151 150 151 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 154
Write 146
Mixed 98
SusWrite 151
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2400C10-4GTX 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 0420 F3-2400C10-4GTX 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme3 - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $728
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback