HP Z200 SFF Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Z200 SFF Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B48h
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160211
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 22 '20 at 06:00
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70% Good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 79 2-Core 151 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 335 38% 298 Pts	64-Core 346 21% 346 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.2% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.53 3% 3.98 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.2% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 233 231 232 232 231 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.5% Above average	Read 234 Write 200 Mixed 182 SusWrite 232 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 27.8 93% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 122 100% 143 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 108%
USB Flash DISK 16GB 1,412 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.3 6.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Read 14.3 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 6.3 9% 7.88 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 5% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 44GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 12.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z200 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 SFF Workstation

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	14x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	13x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	17x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

SSD
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	3x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:01 98 99U5471-020.A00LF ID:01 98 9905471-011.A00LF ID:04 43 RMR1870EC58E9F133 52GBUnknownBench 29%, 3 samples	3x
ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAFA-AE-E ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAFA-AE-E ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAFA-AE-E ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BAFA-AE-E 44GBUnknownBench 36%, 4 samples	3x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 31%, 43 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16