Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 20 '20 at 17:10
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 634
68% 542 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Lighting 97
Reflection 87
Parallax 76.2
79% 86.7 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 80
Splatting 77.7
63% 76.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 101 95 102 102 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 475
Write 452
Mixed 365
SusWrite 118
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 42.5
145% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 237
213% 322 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
827GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 89 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 94.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 90.5
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 61%
JMicron H/W RAID1 1TB
149GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 35 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 34.6
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 35.7
46% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.4% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $658
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback