Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 29 '17 at 07:28
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 281
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 800
80% 652 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 65.2
58% 69.3 fps
MRender 76.2
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 61.9
55% 68.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 493
Write 234
Mixed 312
76% 347 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 25
155% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 83.2
106% 188 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90%
Great: 95%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
491GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 62.7
Mixed 67
49% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.23
82% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
456GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 169
Write 139
Mixed 139
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.26
106% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
201GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 71.5
Mixed 66.4
51% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.23
80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 63%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
194GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 60.8
Mixed 67.2
50% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.53
131% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 25.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,096
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback