MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7786
MotherboardMSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 04:43
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 102
1-Core 50.8
2-Core 99.9
57% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 98
8-Core 99.2
13% 98.6 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0F02) 2GB
CLim: 833 MHz, MLim: 312 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 5.03
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 3.81
4% 4.92 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 12 11 13 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.89% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 19
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 12
12% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 7.89%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
87GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 108 106 111 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 110
Write 40.5
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 108
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-026.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 16.7
239% 16.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-P33 (MS-7786) Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786) - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback