Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '17 at 16:06
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B50
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 55
2-Core 110
52% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 218
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 1376 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 20.4
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 17.3
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 458
Write 207
Mixed 285
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 21.5
67% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 69
96% 177 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 84%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 82.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 181
Write 120
Mixed 119
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.27
101% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-173.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/2GX KHX1600C9D3/2GX 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 12.6
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback