Asus Strix GL504GW_GL504GW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Strix GL504GW_GL504GW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL504GW
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 18 '20 at 23:21
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 784
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1711) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4587
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 113
Parallax 116
92% 114 fps
MRender 152
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 94.4
92% 115 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 351 262 345 321 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,016
Write 972
Mixed 886
SusWrite 293
177% 792 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 62.6
213% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 733
608% 865 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 166%
Great: 187%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
481GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 97 103 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 48.7
Write 61.2
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 100
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Strix GL504GW_GL504GW Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Asus Strix GL504GW_GL504GW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback