Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '20 at 23:07
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	69% Good	Memory 66.1 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 195 66% 120 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 637 62% 512 Pts	64-Core 1,001 62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.5% Average	Lighting 48 Reflection 55.4 Parallax 45 39% 49.5 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 48 Splatting 62.6 49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 564 304 313 305 302 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	145% Outstanding	Read 1,365 Write 1278 Mixed 1,068 SusWrite 348 227% 1,015 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 46.7 158% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 630 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 255 240% 384 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 302%
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB 5,323 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 106GB free Firmware: SAFM12.G SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 118 158 158 155 161 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 490 Write 470 Mixed 343 SusWrite 201 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 31.3 111% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 187 184% 291 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54 11,103 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 94GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 435 202 6.5 6.3 6.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 491 Write 446 Mixed 402 SusWrite 182 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 24.6 116% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 34.8 88% 178 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 901GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 106 108 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 105 Write 92.5 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 107 66% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 62%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 115GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 88 87 88 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 91.3 Write 63.5 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 86.4 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 59%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 17GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 48 47 47 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 50.2 Write 32 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 47.4 31% 41.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 121 125 125 125 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 97.5 Write 128 Mixed 87 SusWrite 123 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.1 132% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 4x8GB 581 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.8% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 24.4 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 22.1 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $91Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $44Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $525

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16