Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '20 at 18:59
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 206
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 504
57% 446 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 108
Parallax 92.4
82% 100 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 93.1
Splatting 93
77% 93.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 449 448 455 454 453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 460
Mixed 424
SusWrite 452
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 42.7
137% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 363
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 113 114 113 113 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 109
Write 67.5
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 112
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 114%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
0GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.2 2 0.3 2.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 4
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 2.6
8% 9.45 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.1
114% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 22%
Crucial_ CT525MX300SSD1 525GB
362GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 31.5
Write 25.2
Mixed 28
SusWrite 16.1
33% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 7.2
517% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 78%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
273GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 25
Mixed 20
SusWrite 16.1
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 19.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback