Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 21:03
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 77.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 249
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 995
89% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,887
117% 1,887 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 55
Parallax 48
46% 53.3 fps
MRender 44.9
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 49.7
40% 48.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
850GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1305 1368 1366 1430 1356 1354 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,521
Write 1,331
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 1,363
295% 1,312 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 49.5
191% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 232
213% 343 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 220%
Great: 295%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
71GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 6.5 17 148 6.2 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.6% Very poor
Read 152
Write 2
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 37.1
11% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 2.2
17% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 41.3
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 16.6
15% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 102%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
18GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 80 85 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44% Average
Read 71.2
Write 79.7
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 81.8
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44%
Great: 83%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB
3GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 3.8 4.2 3.7 4.2 3.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 6
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 4.1
14% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.3
146% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 36.6
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 29.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback