Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181204
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '20 at 20:25
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 975 86% 727 Pts	64-Core 1,627 101% 1,627 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% EVGA(3842 1071) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 130 Reflection 122 Parallax 124 106% 126 fps	MRender 174 Gravity 122 Splatting 98.1 103% 131 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,594 Write 2,130 Mixed 859 410% 1,861 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 71.2 254% 92.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,332 DQ Write 1,163 DQ Mixed 1,215 920% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Lacie d2 Professional 10TB 149 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 8.5TB free Firmware: 235C SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 151 88 178 159 144 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 258 Write 52.2 Mixed 122 SusWrite 150 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.3 23% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 43%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 105GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 487 487 488 488 487 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 487 Mixed 451 SusWrite 487 109% 484 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 96.3 4K Mixed 56.8 190% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 352 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 463GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 487 487 488 488 487 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 485 Mixed 455 SusWrite 487 109% 485 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 99.2 4K Mixed 57 192% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 353 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 133%
JMicron Generic 512GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 396GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 406 405 406 406 406 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 321 Write 392 Mixed 299 SusWrite 406 494% 354 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 21.7 1,690% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 29.7 DQ Mixed 23.7 1,899% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 272%
Multi-Reader -1 128GB 248 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 118GB free, PID 6368 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 55 53 52 51 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 85.2 Write 55.2 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 51.3 74% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 5.3 344% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 57%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 813GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 92 93 92 92 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 144 Write 144 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 92.5 128% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB 3,127 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 27.2 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 37.1 SC Mixed 29.2 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 59.9 67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	966x
Core i7-9700KIntel $263Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	286x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	107x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	105x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	139x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $816

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16