Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory53.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190129
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 21:13
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 990
95% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,533
95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 169
Reflection 174
Parallax 174
137% 172 fps
Gravity 156
Splatting 115
117% 135 fps
Poor: 122% Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 901 1185 1644 1683 1691 1644 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2461
Write 2,144
Mixed 1815
SusWrite 1,458
442% 1,969 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 82
270% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 1,208
DQ Write 1,013
DQ Mixed 1,119
836% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 321%
Great: 410%
Mercury Electra 6G SSD 250GB
94GB free
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 36 59 25 10 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 484
Write 420
Mixed 369
SusWrite 100
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 12.8
86% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 88.8
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 15.4
67% 141 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
839GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 131 162 163 171 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 170
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 148
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 1.5TB
694GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 72 85 85 85 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 85.2
Write 67
Mixed 43
SusWrite 75.7
89% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 083A 2TB
659GB free, PID 083a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 69 78 78 76 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 77.7
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 71.8
92% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX4M4K3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 33.7
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 47.4
SC Mixed 31.5
96% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 110%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback