Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 17:18
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 127
54% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 210
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8
Parallax 11.6
7% 9.29 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 8.93
Splatting 7.87
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 379 389 317 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 287
Write 174
Mixed 312
SusWrite 271
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 37.5
137% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 174
140% 196 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
438GB free
Firmware: CC82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 137 134 133 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 170
Write 122
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 135
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 114%
Asmt 2115 128GB
115GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 92 92 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6BFR8C-PB DMT451E6BFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback