Lenovo 81VW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81VW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory28 GB free of 36 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200310
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateApr 14 '20 at 16:14
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 216
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 352
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
8.99% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 12.1
6% 10.5 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 30.5
15% 16.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 849 486 502 472 469 480 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,784
Write 2,190
Mixed 1,715
SusWrite 543
350% 1,558 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 62.6
208% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 240
190% 267 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 182%
Great: 390%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD M471A5244CB0-CTD 35GB
2667, 2667 MHz
32767, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 15.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81VW Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback