VIT M2421

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVIT M2421  (all builds)
MotherboardVIT M2421
Memory3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '20 at 18:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 90
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 114
56% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 155
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 53
3% 53 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 9981) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.44
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 4.04
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 72 49 87 88 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 91.9
Write 89.8
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 75.1
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.7 4 4.1 4.1 4 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
8.64% Terrible
Read 20
Write 10
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 3.8
13% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
62% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.64%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3010EC58E8F1333 859B CT25664BF160B.D8FE 4GB
1334, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.1% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2421 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: VIT M2421

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback