Asus G750JM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G750JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JM
Memory21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '17 at 16:41
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 99
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 507
50% 410 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 157D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 6.81
3% 9.63 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 7.74
5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0803B5a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 486
Write 249
Mixed 262
73% 332 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 11
72% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 10.9
44% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
745GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 100
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.2
65% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB
202GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 50.4
Mixed 39.3
59% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.12
48% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 0420 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 19.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JM Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback