Asus P5QLD PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5QLD PRO  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '20 at 08:29
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 79.5
41% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 81.9
8-Core 82.1
11% 82 Pts
64-Core 82.6
5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Asus(1043 0324) 512MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.75
2% 2.28 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 3.03
Splatting 1.52
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor STM380215A 80GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 34 26 28 29 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 47.3
Write 23.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 28.2
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
69% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HM251JI 250GB
149GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 26.8
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 26
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QLD PRO Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QLD PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback