Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '20 at 13:13
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,035
99% 816 Pts
64-Core 1,490
92% 1,490 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.4% Average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 72.2
50% 64.6 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 61
Splatting 54.8
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZTC-PCIEG3-256G 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0607A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,445
Write 429
Mixed 592
179% 822 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 31.4
214% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 39.8
134% 290 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 174%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
750GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 183
Write 188
Mixed 35.7
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 108%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
168GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67.7
Write 67.7
Mixed 39
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 61%
Hitachi HCP725050GLA380 500GB
846GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 178
Write 166
Mixed 44.2
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$24
465GB free
Firmware: 8104
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 195
Write 182
Mixed 83
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 114%
FUJITSU MHV2120AT 120GB
112GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 31.5
Write 31.2
Mixed 20.5
35% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 15%
WD My Passport 0837 2TB
665GB free, PID 0837
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.5
Write 35.5
Mixed 28.2
42% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 44%
Samsung G3 Station 1TB
484GB free, PID 6012
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38
Write 39.5
Mixed 36
49% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 20%
Samsung G3 Station 1TB
789GB free, PID 6012
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.5
Write 21.7
Mixed 36
39% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/4GX Silicon Power SP008GXLZU320BSA KHX3200C16D4/4GX Silicon Power SP008GXLZU320BSA 24GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 32.7
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 32.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback