Koloe X58

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Koloe X58 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '20 at 06:57
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 140 63% 101 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 427 44% 355 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 105F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 21.3 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 19.6 17% 19.1 fps	MRender 24.3 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 16.8 17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Faspeed K5-256G 256GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 215GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQE1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 120 134 135 135 136 MB/s Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.9% Above average	Read 252 Write 216 Mixed 200 SusWrite 141 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 22.2 88% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 144 109% 145 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: HP74 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 127 129 129 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 126 Write 126 Mixed 65 SusWrite 128 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 88%
Sony Storage Media 8GB 1,494 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 05ba Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5.3 11 12 11 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	8.39% Terrible	Read 24.5 Write 12 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 9.2 15% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 58% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.39% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 MXIC 25L8005 41GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 33 MHz 8192, 33792 MB Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

CPU
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	88x
Xeon X5660IntelBench 71%, 6,950 samples	78x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	31x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	88x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16