Asrock A75M-HVS

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A75M-HVS (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 9 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '20 at 03:20
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	43%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 66.4 1-Core 46.5 2-Core 92.6 43% 68.5 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 170 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.3% Very good	Lighting 88.5 Reflection 78.8 Parallax 80.4 72% 82.6 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 71 Splatting 70.3 67% 83.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston V300S37A120G 120GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 111GB free Firmware: P0921A SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 146 146 147 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 204 Write 146 Mixed 120 SusWrite 142 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 55.1 4K Mixed 12.3 66% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 62.7 72% 122 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 52%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 772GB free (System drive) Firmware: SM28 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 80 94 92 95 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 104 Write 113 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 90.9 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 2 380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 65%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 32GB 866 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 26GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 16 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 27.8 Mixed 21 SusWrite 15.9 31% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 80% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GIS Samsung M391B2873FH0-CH9 9GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 1024 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.9 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238

CPU
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	18x
Athlon II X4 641AMDBench 48%, 1,109 samples	10x
Athlon II X4 651AMDBench 50%, 1,008 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples	8x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	5x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x

SSD
SU650 480GBAdata $89Bench 69%, 17,796 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16