Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 11 '20 at 01:37
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 304
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,194
106% 896 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 120
Parallax 137
106% 129 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 118
Splatting 99.4
104% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 217 216 217 217 219 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 448
Mixed 287
SusWrite 224
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 41.6
156% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 249
206% 295 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 101%
Intel SSDSC2BB300G4R 300GB
30GB free
Firmware: D201DL12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 336 334 335 332 334 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 349
Write 332
Mixed 265
SusWrite 334
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 33.4
137% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 248
191% 261 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88%
Great: 92%
Intel SSDSC2BB300G4R 300GB
53GB free
Firmware: D201DL12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 296 299 283 276 280 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 348
Write 330
Mixed 266
SusWrite 294
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 34.4
138% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 247
191% 261 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
953GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 156 150 159 151 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 152
Write 116
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 151
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
660GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 160 162 163 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 145
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 160
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
534GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 182 185 184 182 185 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 102
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 184
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 029E CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 28.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 27.1
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 12,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $808
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback