Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '14 at 19:42
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
74% 164 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 438
58% 435 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 51% Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 042A) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13% Very poor
Lighting 5.98
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 15.6
5% 11.6 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 46.3
29% 33.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 13%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M5S 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 433
Write 358
Mixed 412
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 4.12
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 31.4
74% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 73.6
98% 178 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 169
Mixed 176
130% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.14
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.23
114% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 107%
HDT72252 5DLAT80 250GB
3GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 41.1
Write 39.2
Mixed 18
40% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.23
76% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback