Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD6(C)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD6(C)  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '17 at 16:50
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 143
59% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 207
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Asus(1043 835D) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 373.6
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 17
Parallax 13
12% 14.8 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 164
Mixed 103
109% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.34
100% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
173GB free
Firmware: V56OA7EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 70.7
Write 62.8
Mixed 39.7
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.31
98% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 40%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
291GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67% Good
Read 133
Write 101
Mixed 19.4
61% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.28
99% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD6(C) Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD6(C)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $791
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback