Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KRMDW
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '17 at 13:25
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4610M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 202
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 285
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4280
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
243GB free
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 475
Write 301
Mixed 335
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 10.8
60% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.5
DQ Write 29.3
DQ Mixed 13.5
14% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 99%
Kingdian S280-120GB 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P090 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 509
Write 304
Mixed 378
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 20.1
98% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 19.4
22% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 113%
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100
70GB free
Firmware: 60AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 433
Write 119
Mixed 173
52% 242 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 10.8
111% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 9.13
25% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback