Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KRMDW
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '17 at 17:20
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4610M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 94
2-Core 153
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 247
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BD) 1GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
243GB free
Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 481
Write 321
Mixed 310
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 11.6
63% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 30
DQ Mixed 12.9
13% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 99%
Kingdian S280-120GB 120GB
94GB free
Firmware: P090 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
70% Good
Read 513
Write 331
Mixed 393
91% 412 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 16.2
93% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 16
20% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70%
Great: 113%
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 305
Write 127
Mixed 180
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 11.5
89% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 11.2
20% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback