Acer Mandolin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Mandolin  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Grumpy_PK
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '20 at 16:58
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 39.6
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 195
56% 108 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 256
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Acer(1025 134F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.28.01
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 8
6% 8.94 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 15.1
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 300 307 302 321 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 321
Write 319
Mixed 286
SusWrite 303
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 23.5
83% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 496
340% 418 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 12GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 24.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mandolin Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Mandolin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback