ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM Node 1, Processor Card

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	IBM Node 1, Processor Card (all builds)
Memory	44.7 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140723
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '20 at 16:49
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 4870 138 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 99.3 1-Core 63.9 2-Core 128 62% 97 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 512 45% 384 Pts	64-Core 1,535 95% 1,535 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 115 Parallax 100 0% 71.9 fps	MRender 98.3 Gravity 105 Splatting 0.04 48% 67.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 999GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 872GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 53 43 43 50 49 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 1,520 Write 1,491 Mixed 1,502 SusWrite 50.1 255% 1,141 MB/s	4K Read 74.7 4K Write 62.6 4K Mixed 67 232% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 221 168% 227 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 162%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 14GB free, PID 5100 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 8.3 7.3 7.3 6.5 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 8.2 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 9.2 17% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.9 123% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D3-62MA104SQV-999 D3-62MA104SQV-999 D3-62MA104SQV-999 D3-62MA104SQV-999 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX16... 96GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1066, 1333, 1066, 1066, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.9% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 6.9 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.4 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 39.7 101% 39.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback