Gigabyte GA-Z97P-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97P-D3  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '20 at 20:11
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 96.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 217
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 438
59% 439 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 68.6
54% 68.8 fps
MRender 73.3
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 56.2
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 301 293 266 290 244 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 441
Mixed 347
SusWrite 275
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.8
198% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$86
926GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 169 173 169 170 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 164
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 168
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
513GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 164 165 163 164 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 110
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 163
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
23GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 35.7
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 35.7
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY8GX3M2B2133C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 0215 CMY8GX3M2B2133C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A2133C11 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 23.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 53.7
74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97P-D3 Builds (Compare 2,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97P-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback