Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190305
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '20 at 18:12
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 119 2-Core 213 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 757 71% 590 Pts	64-Core 1,024 63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300 112,731 User benchmarks, average bench 83% ASRock(1849 5122) ≥ 4GB Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.3.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 92.5 Parallax 201 90% 134 fps	MRender 87.2 Gravity 101 Splatting 126 88% 105 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB 31,107 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c86 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 372 376 376 373 368 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 388 Write 365 Mixed 320 SusWrite 371 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 30.7 111% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 193 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 99%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 321GB free Firmware: SBFK61F1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 428 435 263 100 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 402 Mixed 336 SusWrite 292 84% 372 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 38.8 142% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 220 190% 278 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 102%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 320GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 194GB free, PID a208 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 39 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 38 Mixed 24 SusWrite 39.6 47% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GB 12,603 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 29.6 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 26.1 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X370M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	13x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	12x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	11x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	12x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x

SSD
SPECTRIX S40G 512GBXPGBench 209%, 26,235 samples	3x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 46%, 6,545 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 84%, 15,358 samples	3x
DDR4 2666 2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 4,790 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16