Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_PC  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H110M-D2P-WG-CF
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 00:44
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 215
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 320
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.6% Very good
Lighting 89.6
Reflection 79.6
Parallax 76.7
73% 82 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 70.8
69% 86.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 201 226 228 228 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
81.7% Excellent
Read 224
Write 213
Mixed 215
SusWrite 215
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 50.9
162% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 176
138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 123%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
266GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 107 107 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64% Good
Read 117
Write 104
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 106
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 1315 CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.1% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 23
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_PC Builds (Compare 2,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback