HP 860-050na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 860-050na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160422
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 22:02
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 80%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 206
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 440
54% 411 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 110
Parallax 113
91% 112 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 96.2
Splatting 78.6
82% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
527GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 326 379 410 348 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 368
Write 377
Mixed 282
SusWrite 361
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 23.3
89% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 213
189% 284 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 154 153 154 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 438
Write 156
Mixed 173
SusWrite 154
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 27.5
108% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 184
157% 236 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 143 145 142 145 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 92.2
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 142
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 84%
SDXC Card 128GB
119GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 8.3 6.7 3.2 4.9 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 13.2
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 5.4
28% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.8
186% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 0215 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 22
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 65%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-050na Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: HP 860-050na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback