HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84E7
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 18:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 144
52% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 323
29% 244 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84E7) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 5.44
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 7.09
5% 5.46 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 138 139 137 156 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
66% Good
Read 408
Write 351
Mixed 354
SusWrite 153
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 30.5
100% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 111
110% 176 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
607GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 122 124 125 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 134
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 123
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.5% Above average
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 22
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback