HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84E7
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 18:16
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 163
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 386
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84E7) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 9.5
6% 9.67 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.96
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 139 136 161 123 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 446
Write 379
Mixed 375
SusWrite 143
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 33.8
114% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 110
111% 179 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
607GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 115 108 106 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 134
Write 133
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 113
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.7
251% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.1% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback