Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990XA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 05 '20 at 16:47
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 116
52% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 301
30% 243 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Zotac(19DA 2507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.7% Excellent
Lighting 96.3
Reflection 105
Parallax 160
78% 120 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 124
Splatting 98.3
103% 130 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 262 347 339 375 338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 438
Write 416
Mixed 400
SusWrite 326
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 29.2
94% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 35.3
81% 169 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 133%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
852GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 50 113 89 38 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 308
Write 254
Mixed 188
SusWrite 85.6
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 11.7
40% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 15.3
12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 58%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
154GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 251 284 295 311 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62% Good
Read 416
Write 304
Mixed 250
SusWrite 289
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 19.7
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 137
106% 149 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
729GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 122 122 123 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 117
Write 106
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 121
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A160 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 CML8GX3M2A160 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 16GB
667, 800, 667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990XA-UD3 Builds (Compare 563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback