ADD TO PC
BUILD

Foxconn AGLAIA

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Foxconn AGLAIA (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn AGLAIA
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100518
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '20 at 22:19
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660 2,343 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 155 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 467 47% 383 Pts	64-Core 1,028 64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 18.9 12% 16.1 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 18.1 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X02c08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 210 211 210 110 85 MB/s Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.7% Above average	Read 252 Write 224 Mixed 216 SusWrite 172 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 24.8 84% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 176 128% 162 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 931GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 234 237 234 236 236 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 230 Write 212 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 234 140% 192 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 1.1 232% 2 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965447-034.A00LF 4x4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 18 slots used 16GB DIMM 0h 1333 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.5% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.1 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback