TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B450 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '20 at 00:27
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 240
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 886
81% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,266
78% 1,266 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 82.9%
 Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366)
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 86.5
58% 76.3 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 59.5
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 56.7%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00R240GB 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 227 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 461
Write 271
Mixed 327
SusWrite 109
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 38
147% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 11.1
68% 156 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 80.2%
 Great: 81%
Intel SSDPE2ME400G4 400GB
259GB free
Firmware: 8DV10131
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 470 476 474 473 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 667
Write 478
Mixed 386
SusWrite 475
112% 502 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 41.3
186% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 652
506% 706 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑
This bench: 144%
 Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 45.6%
 Great: 96%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B450 GAMING X Builds (Compare 2,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 GAMING X

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples556x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples260x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples244x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples167x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples138x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples123x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples70x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples65x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples57x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples84x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples75x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback