Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '20 at 11:50
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 97.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 276
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 609
71% 549 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.3% Average
Lighting 53
Reflection 52.5
Parallax 62.8
43% 56.1 fps
MRender 53.4
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 38.1
38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 942 671 671 669 673 668 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,104
Write 1,826
Mixed 1,126
SusWrite 716
322% 1,443 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 98.2
334% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1856
DQ Write 1,728
DQ Mixed 1743
1,321% 1,776 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 311%
Great: 340%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
936GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 169 172 173 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 118
Write 137
Mixed 29
SusWrite 172
82% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
289GB free
Firmware: SM28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 98 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 93.6
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 99.4
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2
382% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST9320320AS 320GB-$60
280GB free
Firmware: 0303
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 66 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 64.2
Mixed 38
SusWrite 65.1
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%
WDC WD12 00BEVS-07LAT0 120GB
96GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 34.5
Mixed 23
SusWrite 33.8
42% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 38
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 33.1
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 48.6
82% 48.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 115%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback